Vets Against Live Export
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Newsletter
  • Gov correspondence
  • IO reports
  • High-mortality voyages
  • Media
  • Scientific & legal
  • Live export Brazil
  • Join
  • About
    • In-depth

The ESCAS report: what it does tell us

27/1/2015

2 Comments

 
Apparently, live export provides the "greenest" protein to feed millions of families in the world. Hard to know what exactly is green about the live export industry:
feedlotting?
using palm oil to cheaply fatten cattle in the Indonesian feedlots?
inefficiently shipping live animals not carcases?

The report also tells us that the Ag Departments maths are none too good....figures dont always add up in tables (Try Table C3)  and, regardless, are discrepant with the figures on the Department's own website.  No matter how they massage the figures, 17/23 completed reports/complaints on ESCAS non-compliance had adverse animal welfare outcomes (74%) and 16/23 (70%) of these reports were submitted by independent parties.
2 Comments

The ESCAS report: what it doesnt say!

27/1/2015

1 Comment

 
  • world animal welfare standards is clearly the new sound-bite…..ESCAS requires compliance with OIE recommendations which are “lowest common denominator” guidelines achievable for developing and third world countries. They would be unacceptable under Australian domestic animal welfare law
  • virtually all of the countries which import Australian animals have neither effective animal welfare laws, nor a culture which seeks to protect animals from cruelty. The idea that Australia can impose animal welfare requirements in these countries is unrealistic in the extreme and lets face it, if we had improved animal welfare by 30 years of live exporting (as we are told we have), ESCAS wouldnt have been necessary in the first place;
  • there is no requirement anywhere in the live export supply chain for auditors or reviewers who are totally independent of the exporter.
  • the Department of Agriculture promotes live export, and also purports to regulate it.  The major focus is clearly promotion and despite significant breaches of ESCAS the Dept has imposed no penalties on any exporter;
  • adverse outcomes are by and large only identified by independent parties, mainly by a not for profit charity, Animals Australia. One would be justified in thinking that an even higher level of detection of bad outcomes would have been recorded had there been further independent monitoring
1 Comment

So live export doesnt compete with the domestic market..????

16/1/2015

0 Comments

 
Last year VALE asked how Australia was going to fill its orders for the rapidly expanding trade....and now we have our answer. And it certainly isnt one that is good for animal welfare. With northern suppliers unable to meet demand, we are now trucking Bos taurus cattle from below the 26th parallel from Victoria and South Australia to Darwin, approximately 3000 plus km away in the heat of a southern mid-summer and the heat and humidity of a northern wet season.

So, yes it makes economic sense Mr Howie but its completely unethical. And how exactly are you doing it? Cattle can only be held off water for a maximum of 48h. These trips alone take at least 48h.

Oh and yes thats right, the live export market is a niche market that doesnt compete with the domestic market....at least, thats what we've always been told!
0 Comments

Even exporters think penalties too soft!

13/1/2015

0 Comments

 
Wellard have commented that penalties too soft for ESCAS breaches. So, if the exporters support stronger penalties, surely the government must take notice and finally act.

The recent court case over the multiple breaches of the law that occurred on the Hereford Express (High Mortality Voyage 29) exposed that there is no government will to prosecute any live export breaches, even very serious breaches (ie mortalities on the vet report altered by the exporter, more sheep unloaded than loaded despite deaths, no stockman on board etc). Why dont they prosecute? They dont have to.

0 Comments

Loading cattle in Adelaide heat

7/1/2015

25 Comments

 
Soaring temperatures in early January were no impediment to trucking cattle to Adelaide Port and loading them onto the Ghena. Photographs on 2nd January (temp max 44 degrees) show drooling cattle which correspond to the MLA panting score of 2 or 2.5.

MLA recommendations for feedlot cattle are are follows: "For management purposes, if more than 10% of cattle are exhibiting panting scores of 2 or above, all handling and movement of the affected cattle should be stopped and only resumed when conditions become cooler and cattle have returned to normal".

But that's right, live export has a different respiratory character score to the MLA feedlot score...oh and they dont include drooling in their classification (McCarthy 2005). How very convenient....same cattle, same country but different purpose so different animal welfare guidelines. But just remember, we do really care about Australian livestock in Australia.
25 Comments

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All
    Alternatives To Live Export
    Problems With The System

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Newsletter
  • Gov correspondence
  • IO reports
  • High-mortality voyages
  • Media
  • Scientific & legal
  • Live export Brazil
  • Join
  • About
    • In-depth